Regulatory control mapping
Translate applicable SAMA Cyber Security Framework and NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls requirements into traceable obligations, control libraries and assigned ownership.
SERVICENOW IRM / GRC · SAUDI ARABIA
FLEXSHIELD helps Saudi government, banking and regulated enterprises design ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management (IRM/GRC) workflows that connect risk ownership, compliance controls, policy exceptions, testing and verifiable evidence.
Discuss an IRM/GRC maturity assessment ↗Translate applicable SAMA Cyber Security Framework and NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls requirements into traceable obligations, control libraries and assigned ownership.
Structure risk taxonomies, assessments, treatment actions, key risk indicators and leadership reporting.
Coordinate policy attestations, exceptions, obligation reviews, remediation and evidence collection.
Connect control testing, issues, audit observations and evidence requests with accountable workflows.
Connect CMDB, ITSM, security operations and identity data where appropriate, with clear data stewardship.
Define responsibility, approval paths, quality gates and measurable adoption across risk and technology teams.
Regulated enterprises may have well-documented policies yet lack reliable operational evidence. Control ownership is spread across cybersecurity, compliance, internal audit, procurement and IT; assessments are duplicated, evidence ages quickly and leadership sees status too late to intervene.
Assess regulatory applicability, operating model, control inventories, evidence sources, pain points and existing GRC tooling.
Define a common control library, regulatory mapping, risk taxonomy, control ownership, policy hierarchy and assurance responsibilities.
Configure ServiceNow IRM risk assessments, policy and compliance workflows, evidence collection, issues, exceptions and remediation with suitable approval controls.
Connect approved ITSM, CMDB, identity, security and asset sources, documenting data lineage and integration ownership.
Pilot selected obligations, validate user journeys and reporting, test evidence traceability and agree ownership of ongoing control testing.
Train risk owners, establish governance forums, monitor remediation and progressively improve coverage and data quality.
Control ownership completeness · evidence freshness · overdue action trends · repeat findings · risk treatment cycle time · audit preparation effort
Technology enables the governance process; it does not independently establish regulatory compliance. Applicable requirements, control effectiveness and audit conclusions depend on scope, evidence and competent assessment.